DeFi
DeFi Smart Contract Audit
A security audit built around the way DeFi actually fails: accounting drift, oracle assumptions, and incentives that pay attackers more than users.
Staking, AMMs, lending, vaults, and reward distribution on any EVM chain. Most DeFi losses are not exotic compiler bugs — they are legal transaction sequences nobody modelled. That is what this audit is aimed at.
- 3 yrs
- Auditing EVM smart contracts
- M-01
- Verified Code4rena finding
- Critical
- Vulnerability found in BulkSender
- Live
- Disclosures to Ronin protocols
Best fit for
AMMs, lending markets, and yield vaults heading for mainnet
Staking and reward contracts that will hold user deposits
Teams integrating external protocols whose assumptions they inherit
Protocols that changed their economics after their last audit
Focus areas
What I dig into on this kind of codebase
Reward & emission maths
Accumulator precision, reward-per-share drift, and the deposit/withdraw sequences that let one address farm everyone else's yield.
AMM & pricing invariants
Curve invariants, fee application order, rounding direction, and whether a swap can leave the pool worse off than it started.
Oracle manipulation
Spot-price dependence, TWAP windows, stale and negative price handling, and the flash-loan cost of moving your feed.
Liquidation & solvency
Bad-debt paths, incentive sizing, partial liquidation edge cases, and what the protocol does when a market gaps.
Token integration risk
Fee-on-transfer, rebasing, non-standard ERC-20 returns, and assumptions about decimals that break on the second chain.
Access & upgradeability
Admin keys, timelocks, proxy storage layout, and the emergency functions that quietly bypass every other control.
Deliverables
What you receive
Severity-rated findings report
Every issue written up with impact, likelihood, the exact affected lines, and a concrete remediation step you can hand straight to a developer.
Proof-of-concept exploits
Where a finding is exploitable I include a reproducible test, so your team can confirm the severity instead of debating it.
Prioritised fix list
Findings ordered by what actually threatens funds first, so a short remediation window is spent on the right things.
Follow-up support
Questions about a finding or a proposed patch get answered while you are still shipping the fix, not after the invoice clears.
Methodology
How the review runs
- 01
Scoping call
A short call to walk through your contracts, chain setup, and deadline. You leave with a fixed price and a delivery date, not an estimate.
- 02
Manual review
Line-by-line reading of the codebase, then targeted analysis of the parts that hold value: accounting, access control, reward maths, and external calls.
- 03
Exploit testing
I write proof-of-concept tests for the paths I think break, so findings arrive with evidence attached instead of a maybe.
- 04
Report & remediation
A written report with severity ratings, reproduction steps, and a concrete fix for each issue. Then I stay reachable while you patch.
- 05
Retest & sign-off
On the Audit + Retest tier I re-review your fixes and issue a final sign-off report you can share with your investors or community.
Pricing
Fixed prices, published up front
Final pricing is confirmed after a brief scoping call based on actual contract complexity. Payment is arranged before the review begins, and the agreed number is the number you pay.
These are introductory prices while I build out my library of public audit reports. They go up after the next five engagements — the rate you book at is the rate you keep for that engagement.
Code Review
€250
Single contract review, up to 200 lines.
- One contract, up to 200 lines
- Manual line-by-line review
- Findings list with severity ratings
- Remediation guidance for every finding
3 day delivery · 1 revision
Start with Code ReviewProtocol Audit
€900
Full multi-contract audit with a written report and severity ratings.
- Multi-contract codebase
- Business logic and economic attack paths
- Proof-of-concept tests for exploitable findings
- Written PDF report with severity ratings
- Remediation guidance for every finding
- Follow-up support on questions
7 day delivery · 3 revisions
Start with Protocol AuditAudit + Retest
€1,600
Full audit plus a post-fix retest and a final sign-off report.
- Everything in Protocol Audit
- Post-fix retest of your patches
- Final sign-off report you can publish
- Extended follow-up support
10 day delivery · 5 revisions
Start with Audit + RetestLarger codebase
From €2,000
Protocols above roughly 1,500 lines, multi-module systems, or anything needing a longer engagement.
Quoted on scope after a call. Same process, same deliverables, same guarantees — the timeline and price just match the size of the job.
No-findings refund
If the review surfaces nothing above informational severity, you get a full refund and keep the report anyway. You should not have to pay to find out there was nothing to find.
The quoted price is the price
The number agreed on the scoping call is the number you pay. No hourly overruns, no scope-creep invoices, no surprise line items after delivery.
Confidential by default
Your code and findings are never published or shared without your written permission. NDA on request, signed before you send anything.
Ship your protocol without wondering what you missed
Send me your repo, chain, and deadline. You get a fixed price and a delivery date back — usually the same day.
No obligation, and a full refund if the review finds nothing above informational severity. If your scope is outside what I cover, I will say so on the call.
FAQ
Questions before you book
What kinds of DeFi protocols do you audit?
AMMs and DEXes, lending markets, yield vaults, staking and reward distributors, token launches, and the periphery contracts that connect them. Solidity and Vyper on any EVM-compatible chain.
Do you review economic design, not just code?
Yes. Reward maths, fee routing, liquidation incentives, and oracle assumptions are reviewed as part of every DeFi engagement, because that is where most real losses originate rather than in syntax-level bugs.
How long does the review take?
Three days for a Code Review, seven for a Protocol Audit, and ten for Audit + Retest. The delivery date is agreed on the scoping call before any work starts.
When do I pay?
Pricing is confirmed after the scoping call and payment is arranged before the review begins. There are no hourly overruns — the agreed number is the number you pay.
Can I see an example report first?
Yes. The full BulkSender and KoinArcade reports are published on this site, so you can judge the depth and format before committing.
Other services
Smart contract security reviews
An independent audit of your Solidity or Vyper contracts on any EVM chain, delivered as a written report in 3–10 days.
GameFi & gambling audit
A security audit for on-chain games, casinos, and reward economies — where randomness, payout accounting, and house edge are the attack surface.
Solidity code review
A focused manual review of a single contract or module — the fastest way to get expert eyes on code before it grows into a full protocol.